Wednesday, February 03, 2010
A little more on Salinger
I'm not actually a Salinger obsessive and don't have much to add to my previous post. However, the New Yorker round-robin of Salinger pieces did include this very interesting paragraph, in Lillian Ross's brief remembrance:
When you think of it, Salinger's recipe isn't so different from what Philip Roth dreamed up for The Facts. The problem in that case was that Roth (for whom the fiction had at least temporarily run out) couldn't quite find the right tone. His sworn testimony sounded oddly sedated--only Zuckerman's acerbic afterword got the electricity flowing again, meanwhile muddying the very waters this "factual" account was supposed to clarify.
Finally: for an interesting take on Salinger's work (and Spike Milligan's) as a reaction to post-WWII shell shock, stop by Baroque in Hackney.
At one point during the more than half century of our friendship, J.D. Salinger told me he had an idea that someday, when "all the fiction had run out," he might try to do something straight, "really factual, formally distinguishing myself from the Glass boys and Holden Caulfield and the other first-person narrators I've used." It might be readable, maybe funny, he said, and "not just smell like a regular autobiography." That main thing was that he would use straight facts and "thereby put off or stymie one or two vultures--freelancers or English-department scavengers--who might come around and bother the children and the family before the body is even cold."It's a tantalizing thought: Salinger Unplugged, with all the deflector shields down and the inconvenient facts to wrestle with. Of course it's possible that this very manuscript exists, stowed down in the bombproof vault with the hundreds of unpublished stories and the author's own, proprietary sequel to Catcher in the Rye, in which the middle-aged hero teaches English and Industrial Arts at a Connecticut high school. I hope it does.
When you think of it, Salinger's recipe isn't so different from what Philip Roth dreamed up for The Facts. The problem in that case was that Roth (for whom the fiction had at least temporarily run out) couldn't quite find the right tone. His sworn testimony sounded oddly sedated--only Zuckerman's acerbic afterword got the electricity flowing again, meanwhile muddying the very waters this "factual" account was supposed to clarify.
Finally: for an interesting take on Salinger's work (and Spike Milligan's) as a reaction to post-WWII shell shock, stop by Baroque in Hackney.
Labels: J.D. Salinger, philip roth
Comments:
<< Home
Check out David Shields on Salinger:
http://www.cityartsmagazine.com/issues/seattle/2010/04/perfect-strangers-shields-takes-salinger
http://www.cityartsmagazine.com/issues/seattle/2010/04/perfect-strangers-shields-takes-salinger
I just couldn’t leave your website before telling you that I truly enjoyed the top quality info you present to your visitors? Will be back again frequently to check up on new posts.
토토
메이저사이트
토토
메이저사이트
It was my excitement discovering your site last night. I came here now hoping to find out interesting things. I was not dissatisfied. Your ideas for new methods on this subject were useful and an excellent help to myself.
경마사이트
경마
경마사이트
경마
I have a hard time describing my thoughts on content, but I really felt I should here. Your article is really great. I like the way you wrote this information
온라인카지노
바카라사이트
온라인카지노
바카라사이트
Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep stuff like this coming.
토토
토토사이트
Post a Comment
토토
토토사이트
<< Home
